Category Archives: grammar/usage

Progressing My Editorial Knowledge

I had some free time today, so I perused Peck’s English Pointers. (Frances Peck is a well-known Canadian editor.) Here’s a sentence submitted to Peck for her scrutiny:

The department continues to progress this matter at a high priority and, given the magnitude of change and rule harmonization required for reflectorization of every rail car in use between the U.S. and Canada, it is being progressed as quickly as possible.

The person who submitted the sentence, which was written by a government worker, wondered about the use of reflectorization. (If you ask me, there are greater problems afoot in this sentence!) Peck’s answer about reflectorization might surprise you, but what I found most interesting was her mention of progress correctly used as a transitive verb. I had no idea it could be used that way.

I bet nine out of ten editors would have changed progress to advance. Progress sounds wrong somehow, doesn’t it?

Of course, how something sounds is little indication of its correctness. I’m thinking of commas used to indicate oral pauses (incorrect) or sentences such as “He’s taller than I,” where than is considered a conjunction by traditionalists (correct but uptight!).

Here are more tools for writers, courtesy of the Canadian government.

The Gift of Grammar

If you’re looking for the perfect gift for the grammar nerd in your life, check out James Harbeck’s Songs of Love and Grammar. This little gem was published in 2012, but I just discovered it today. Here’s a sample: I met a buxom grammatician and said I’d like her out to take; back she cameContinue Reading

Copy Editor Kudos

Recently, award-winning journalist and author Holly Robinson gave a shout-out to copy editors in an article for the online version of The Huffington Post. (Remember the lesson on italics from my last post? Robinson’s article was featured on the “Books” page.) Robinson’s praise focuses on the errors in consistency that copy editors identify and cleanContinue Reading

Who Says Editors Don’t Have a Sense of Humour?

I don’t often use social media abbreviations—BTW, ICYMI, IIRC, TTYL, LOL. They just aren’t me. Call me old school, but other than the occasional FYI, my most commonly used abbreviation is OK. What editor can deny the trenchancy of good old OK? In fact, I recently learned that editors are credited with creating the abbreviation.Continue Reading

Let’s Rest Awhile—in a While

Editors are familiar with the usual suspects when it comes to usage: apt/likely, pore/pour, bring/take, comprise/compose, and so on. These pairs of words are often confused and misused, and editors keep an eye out for them. Well, this editor has a confession to make. There’s a pair of suspects that trips me up: a whileContinue Reading

It Is To Be Hoped the Grammaratti Go Away

Broadcasters and publishers receive a deluge of complaints about grammar and usage. Anna Maria Tremonti, host of CBC Radio’s The Current, dubs these complainers “the grammaratti.” And I’m sure they’ll be expressing displeasure after the grammar discussion on The Current today. Tremonti spoke with Ammon Shea, author of Bad English: A History of Linguistic Aggravation.Continue Reading

Subject-Verb Agreement: Percentages

Single subjects take singular verbs, and plural subjects take plural verbs. But sometimes, the distinction isn’t so obvious, as I’ve discussed before. Here’s a passage from Einsohn’s Copyeditor’s Handbook that had me wondering about subject-verb agreement: In my professional experience I have found that two readings of galleys and two of page proofs will catchContinue Reading

Proofread This

A local ad company recently posted a job opening for a proofreader. The ad ended like this: Spot any errors in this posting? No? Good. Let’s keep it that way. Needless to say, I found a few errors: inconsistent use of the serial comma incorrect use—twice!—of apostrophes with plural nouns incorrect use of a hyphenContinue Reading

Needed: “Require” Inquiry

On editing discussion boards, the personal peeves of various editors inevitably bubble to the surface. A recurring peeve is the use of require for need. This is one particular bugaboo that I’ve never sweated (note to pedants: sweat would be fine here, too. That’s right: both sweat and sweated are acceptable as past tense andContinue Reading